Vridar

2013/02/11

Our Moral Nature

Filed under: Ethics & human nature — Neil Godfrey @ 6:27 pm
An infant

An infant (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Another fascinating Radio National program worth sharing is Babies and a Sense of Morality in the latest edition of the Health Report.

Highlights:

Babies can recognize good and bad behaviour, and demonstrate that they believe good behaviour is preferable, and even believe that it is right to punish bad behaviour.

The experiment involved exposing babies to puppet shows — no words — in which there were three actants. One was attempting to do something such as push a ball up a hill or open a box to get a toy. Another was a helping agent who assisted the first one with the task. The other was bad, attempting to thwart the first one achieving what he wanted.

The babies demonstrated their preference for the helper.

When they saw a show in which someone was bad to the bad puppet, and another was good to him, they demonstrated a preference for the one who was “rightly bad” for punishing the bad guy.

These are behaviours in babies from 3 to 8 months old.

Check the audio file to find out how they conducted the experiments.

I’m not surprised by the findings. (I am surprised that they could figure out how to do experiments to test for such things.) Anyone who has spent time observing the animal kingdom knows that among social birds and animals there are the same basic moral norms governing their social systems as we have in ours. And they have their own protocols for administering punishments for the rule-breakers, too. The same fundamental morality seems to be part of our nature. It’s all about helping our neighbour and punishing behaviours that are harmful to that ethic. There are human universals that cross all cultures that confirm the same thing.

We don’t need no commandments from gods and preachers to teach us what’s right and wrong.

(What worries me is that the experimenter said nearly all babies reacted the same way. Does that mean they had a psychopath in the mix?)

Enhanced by Zemanta
About these ads

3 Comments »

  1. “an infant”… hilarious. Cutie pie

    Comment by Willie Buck Merle — 2013/02/12 @ 3:04 am | Reply

  2. No psychopaths, just ones not paying attention.

    Comment by Marella — 2013/02/12 @ 1:08 pm | Reply

  3. They probably did have potential psychopaths in the mix. There are a couple of recent books about psychopaths and one finding was that psychopaths are made, not born. Some people are narcissistic and have lower empathy. If these people have loving supporting childhoods, they are more likely to end up CEO’s. I’m not kidding. Negative upbringings cause psychopaths. So there is a common set of traits underlying certain very successful people and psychopaths. Upbringing channels those traits into productive or violent means.

    Comment by Mark Erickson — 2013/02/12 @ 1:36 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 180 other followers

%d bloggers like this: